FANDOM


Link rot (or linkrot) is the process by which links on a website gradually become irrelevant or broken as time goes on, because websites that they link to disappear, change their content or redirect to new locations.

The phrase also describes the effects of failing to update web pages so that they become out-of-date, containing information that is old and useless, and that clutters up search engine results.

PrevalenceEdit

The 404 "not found" response is familiar to even the occasional Web user. A number of studies have examined the prevalence of link rot on the Web, in academic literature, and in digital libraries. In a 2003 experiment, Fetterly et al. (2003) discovered that about one link out of every 200 disappeared each week from the internet. McCown et al. (2005) discovered that half of the URLs cited in D-Lib Magazine articles were no longer accessible 10 years after publication, and other studies have shown link rot in academic literature to be even worse (Spinellis, 2003, Lawrence et al., 2001). Nelson and Allen (2002) examined link rot in digital libraries found that about 3% of the objects were no longer accessible after one year.

Some news sites contribute to the link rot problem by keeping only recent news articles online where they are freely accessible at their original URLs, then removing them or moving them to a paid subscription area. This causes a heavy loss of supporting links in sites discussing newsworthy events and using news sites as references.

DiscoveringEdit

Detecting link rot for a given URL is difficult using automated methods. If a URL is accessed and returns back an HTTP 200 (OK) response, it may be considered accessible, but the contents of the page may have changed and may no longer be relevant. Some web servers also return a soft 404, a page returned with a 200 (OK) response (instead of a 404) that indicates the URL is no longer accessible. Bar-Yossef et al. (2004) developed a heuristic for automatically discovering soft 404s.

CombatingEdit

The WordPress blog publishing systems implements a guard against link rot. If an author renames a link, the old link automatically redirects to the new location.[1]

Web archivingEdit

To combat link rot, web archivists are actively engaged in collecting the Web or particular portions of the Web and ensuring the collection is preserved in an archive, such as an archive site, for future researchers, historians, and the public. The largest web archiving organization is the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, which strives to maintain an archive of the entire Web, taking periodic snapshots of pages that can then be accessed for free and without registration many years later simply by typing in the URL. National libraries, national archives and various consortia of organizations are also involved in archiving culturally important Web content.

Individuals may also use a number of tools that allow them to archive web resources that may go missing in the future:

  • WebCite, a tool specifically for scholarly authors, journal editors and publishers to permanently archive "on-demand" and retrieve cited Internet references (Eysenbach and Trudel, 2005).
  • Archive-It, a subscription service that allows institutions to build, manage and search their own web archive
  • hanzo:web is a personal web archiving service created by Hanzo Archives that can archive a single web resource, a cluster of web resources, or an entire website, as a one-off collection, scheduled/repeated collection, an RSS/Atom feed collection or collect on-demand via Hanzo's open API.

WebmastersEdit

Webmasters have developed a number of best practices for combating link rot:

  • Avoiding unmanaged hyperlink collections
  • Avoiding links to pages deep in a website ("deep linking")
  • Using hyperlink checking software or a Content Management System (CMS) that automatically checks links
  • Using permalinks
  • Using redirection mechanisms (e.g. "301: Moved Permanently") to automatically refer browsers and crawlers to the new location of a URL

Authors citing URLsEdit

A number of studies have shown how wide-spread link rot is in academic literature (see below). Authors of scholarly publications have also developed best-practices for combating link rot in their work:

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

Further reading Edit

Link rot on the WebEdit

In academic literatureEdit

In digital librariesEdit

External linksEdit

sv:Länkröta


Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.